- id: 1
  pid: 1
  author: "林川"
  email: "linchuan@example.com"
  content: "这篇做长文测试很合适，段落密度和古文节奏都不错。"
  approved: true

- id: 2
  pid: 1
  author: "阿青"
  email: "aqing@example.com"
  content: "建议后面再加几篇山水游记，方便测试问答检索是否能区分不同山名。"
  approved: true

- id: 3
  pid: 2
  author: "周宁"
  email: "zhouling@example.com"
  content: "这一段关于南岩和琼台的描写很好，适合测试段落评论锚点。"
  approved: true

- id: 4
  pid: 3
  author: "顾远"
  email: "guyuan@example.com"
  content: "悬空寺这一段信息量很大，拿来测试 AI 摘要应该很有代表性。"
  approved: true

- id: 5
  pid: 4
  author: "清嘉"
  email: "qingjia@example.com"
  content: "黄山记的序文很适合测试首屏摘要生成。"
  approved: true

- id: 6
  pid: 5
  author: "石霁"
  email: "shiji@example.com"
  content: "想看看评测页和文章页共存时，搜索能不能把这类古文结果排在前面。"
  approved: false

- id: 7
  pid: 3
  author: "江禾"
  email: "jianghe@example.com"
  content: "如果后续要做段落评论，这篇恒山记很适合，因为章节分段比较清晰。"
  approved: true